Muscular Impairments

The Longitudinal Arch: Our Bodies Shock Absorption System

Understanding that the foot and ankle complex has the greatest contributing factor to the Human Movement System, hence the greatest influence on each of the systems that Clark et al (2011) describe, any arthrokinomatic dysfunction or muscular imbalance, such as a decrease in control over the medial longitudinal arch, can result in an altered mechanical approach to the HMS leading to a possible cumulative injury cycle(Clark et al, 2011).  As described by Clark and Lucett, in order for the body to operate in optimal neuromuscular control, there are three factors that must be in proper position:

  • optimal length-tension relationship: which correlates to the amount of tension a muscle can produce at its resting length.
  • Optimal force-couple relationship: which are the synergistic muscles or helper muscles that help produce force around a joint at different angles. 
  • Normal joint arthokinematics: which occurs when there is proper length-tension relationship and optimal force-couple relationships.

These three components, described by Lucett and Clark, provide optimal sensorimotor, neuromuscular efficiency, and optimal tissue recovery.  When there is a deviation from them, the result is an altered joint dysfunction that creates an altered relationship of aforementioned components of the Human Movement System (HMS).

The medial longitudinal arch is a “load-bearing and shock-absorbing structure of the foot,” as described by Neumann.  This arched configuration provides the bones the ability to receive and diminish the excessive loads that are placed on the body during impact situations, such as running and jumping.  During neutral stance on healthy feet, the connective tissue of the longitudinal arch is optimal to support the body weight without the integration of intrinsic and extrinsic muscles of the foot (Neumann, 2011).  When the longitudinal arch is not able to support the pressure of the body weight, this can result in “flat feet” or Pes Planus.   A person with pes planus, lacks the ability of the foot to dissipate loads, and requires intrinsic and extrinsic muscles of the foot to engage to help compensate for the lack of tension in the connective tissue.  Neumann states that even during standing that the client may develop fatigue and overuse symptoms, such as “shin splints,” bone spurs and plantar fasciitis.  Hyperpronation, as defined by Khamis et al(2006), is “the rear foot pronation that is excessive, prolonged, and as a result, causing the foot to remain in maximum pronation, too late or never resupinate in terminal stance for push off (Khamis et al, 2006)”.   The kinematic dysfunction of the foot will throw the tibia into internal rotation which puts the hip into internal rotation and a flexed position, causing genu valgum and increasing the Q-Angle of the hip joint.  This kinetic dysfunction places the hip into anterior pelvic tilt and lordosis of the spine.

A lack of posterior glide to the talus commonly appears in subjects that experience an injury to the ankle joint such as a lateral ankle sprain.  The result of the injury is commonly a decreased posterior glide of the talus resulting in a limited range of dorsiflexion.   This limited range of motion in the HMS in regards to dorsiflexion creates a shortened muscle complex primarily the gastrocnemius and the soleus (Denegar, Fonseca, Hertel, 2002).  According to the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, in addition to the lack of posterior glide on the talus, restricted motion at the tibiofibular, subtalar, or midtarsal joint, or any combination of the previous, could also limit ankle dorsiflexion.   The lengthened or weakened muscles that will be affected is the dorsiflexor of the anterior tibialis.  The weakened anterior tibialis muscle eccentrically decelerates plantar flexion at heel strike and decelerates pronation at forefoot (NASM Unit 3).  This excessive pronation of the subtalar joint will create a dysfunction in the HMS that could possible lead to pronation distortion syndrome and affecting the proper arthokinematics of the Lateral Subsystem (Clark and Lucett 2011).   Possible arthrokinomatic dysfunctions would be increased knee adduction, knee internal rotation that may lead to possible plantar fasciitis, patellar tendonitis, and posterior tibialis tendonitis (shin splints) (Clark and Lucett, 2011).

References:

Clark, Michael, and Scott Lucett. NASM Essentials of Corrective Exercise Training. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010. Pr

Denegar, C., Hertel, J., & Fonseca, J. (2002). The effect of lateral ankle sprain on dorsiflexion range of motion, posterior talar glide, and joint laxity. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 32(4), 171.

Clark, Michael and Scott Lucett, NASM Functional  Anatomy Presentation, Unit 3 Handout.  Print.

Schedule a Corrective Exercise Assessment
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

Please follow and like us:
error

2 thoughts on “The Longitudinal Arch: Our Bodies Shock Absorption System

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *